zenon.arouseo
2021年4月19日
Comparison with Skybox
1. Only Pigasus and Skybox are currently sole media players who render to the frame of the video file. Fortunately, I experienced both. This is a very important function. difference is whether you can see a soft video like the butter melting or road made of stone by drive car, depending on the function and not. 2. Hue adjustment function not found in Skybox but present in Pygasus. 3. I'm happy to have SMB support and Favorite features. It is also available in Skybox, but Pygasus is cheaper than Skybox and works. But when playing a file from SMB, Time head change position sometimes lacking video or video playing there when the longer it takes. I hope it will be improved. 4. You can see image files like JPG right away. It's very good! ———— 5. Unfortunately, app logo and design sophistication of the virtual movie theater may be lacking, but there are two things that are more important. First, when using the point-of-time movement function by pressing and holding the trigger, Skybox method is less cognitive burden for the audience. This is because the box-type UI, which is supposed to set the point you want to see around while maintaining the 3D effect, was a good experience. Second regret is that if the video playback default was set to 3D in the setting, screen cannot be viewed properly when an image file such as JPG is called. Therefore, there is a hassle of having to go to options and switch to 2D mode every time. Therefore, it would be nice to set the default value to 2D mode when importing image file. Even if the default value of the image is 3D mode, I want to see the correct 2D image right away when I see the JPG file. 6. It would be nice to have a variety of modes that correspond to the various angles of the 3D lens used for filming, but it would be good to proceed gradually. Before that, it would be best to automatically analyze and show whether the video is 2D or 3D. I chose Pygasus despite a few regret in comparison with Skybox.
79 人觉得有用
